Re: Kaks lauset robotitest
![Post Post](./styles/GlossyBlack/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
No see konkreetne "asi" ongi keppimiseks mõeldud (suht)... See vorm tuleb lihtsalt liita mõne Jaapanist imporditud toimiva robootilise skeletiga ;)
by Ordo Veneris Atrae
http://mvo.saadanas.org/foorum/phpBB3/
http://mvo.saadanas.org/foorum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=8
janMortis wrote:Puid saan ma ise ka lõhutud...
The experimenters suggested this means we don’t emotionally resonate with robots as well as we do with humans, but we relate to robot facial motions better when we attend to their emotions.
And another central question remains. Now that robots are taking over traditional human roles, when will we start scanning their ‘brains’ and investigating whether they can empathize with us?
Recently, a Japanese robotics company debuted a walking, talking Gynoid (inelegantly) named HRP-4C, designed primarily for being a fashion model. Of course posts were written about her on various blogs and websites, with the usual disparaging comments about ‘uncanny valley’, and ‘Japan is weird’, and ‘that thing is creepy’, and etc. There was this one blog post that simply detailed the facts and figures, mentioned the critiques that some people had about a Gynoid runway model, and brilliantly ended the post with ‘Nobody though much of the first Toyotas, either.’
Hong Kongis asuva Hiina ülikooli teadlased on leidnud viisi ühendada bakterid andmekandjaks koos krüpteerimisega. Projekt sai nimeks "biokrüpteerimine" ning asjakohase info selle kohta leiab siit. Andmete hoidmine on saanud täiesti uue taseme - 90 gigabaiti andmeid peideti 1 grammi bakterite sisse.
The girl holds up a yellow toy dinosaur and waves it in front of Kismet. She moves the toy to the right, then to the left, and the robot turns its head to follow. Turkle, who can be seen off to the side (with a shorter haircut and larger glasses than now), says she gave almost no guidance to the girl—the goal was to put robot and child together and see what would happen. "It's called a first-encounter study. I say, 'I want you to meet an interesting new thing.'"
As we watch, the girl tries to cover the robot with a cloth to dress it, and then tries to clip a microphone to the robot. Soon Kismet is saying the girl's name and other simple statements, and the girl experiments with other ways to communicate with this mix of steel, gears, and microchips.
Most of the kids in the study loved Kismet and described the robot as a friend that liked them back, despite careful explanations by Turkle's colleagues that it was simply programmed to respond to certain cues and was definitely not alive. The response appears to be a natural one, Turkle says. "We are hard-wired that if something meets extremely primitive standards, either eye contact or recognition or very primitive mutual signaling, to accept it as an Other because as animals that's how we're hard-wired—to recognize other creatures out there."
One day during Turkle's study at MIT, Kismet malfunctioned. A 12-year-old subject named Estelle became convinced that the robot had clammed up because it didn't like her, and she became sullen and withdrew to load up on snacks provided by the researchers. The research team held an emergency meeting to discuss "the ethics of exposing a child to a sociable robot whose technical limitations make it seem uninterested in the child," as Turkle describes in Alone Together. "Can a broken robot break a child?" they asked. "We would not consider the ethics of having children play with a damaged copy of Microsoft Word or a torn Raggedy Ann doll. But sociable robots provoke enough emotion to make this ethical question feel very real."
Katsete käigus jälgisid teadlased, kuidas robotõde Cody puhastas inimeste käsivart. Kuigi puudutused olid alati samasugused, suhtusid inimesed roboti tegevusse erinevalt, vastavalt sellele, mida nad pidasid roboti tegevuse eesmärgiks.
Kui inimesed olid kindlad, et roboti puudutused on nende jaoks otseselt vajalikud, polnud neil midagi protseduuri vastu. Niipea, kui katsealustele tundus, et robot üritab neid lohutada, muutus tegevus ebameeldivaks.
Jaapani inseneride loodud robot kasutab tundmatu ülesande lahendamiseks oma mõtlemisvõimet. Kahest Jaapani ettevõttest koosnev Hasegawa Group esitles Tokyo tehnoloogiainstituudis robotit, mis kasutab tehnoloogiat SOINN (Self-Organising Incremental Neural Network - iseorganiseeruv järkjärguliselt kasvav närvivõrgustik).
Robot suudab tehisintellekti kasutades iseseisvalt mõelda, õppida ja tegutseda. Siiani on robotid, sealhulgas tööstuslikud robotid, suutnud küll kiiresti ja korrektselt täita neile antud konkreetseid ülesandeid, kuid jäänud jänni isegi väikeste töökeskkonna muutuste korral. SOINN tehnoloogia võimaldab robotil aga ülesande täitmisel tekkinud tundmatutes olukordades mõelda sarnaselt inimestega, kirjutab Novaator.
Tundmatu olukorraga silmitsi seistes kasutab robot olukorrale teadmistele tugineva hinnangu andmiseks oma varasemaid kogemusi. Selleks organiseerib robot iseseisvalt oma olemasolevaid sisendandmeid. Ülesande täitmiseks vajalike andmete puudumisel palub robot abi ning robotit on võimalik ka uut ülesannet täitma õpetada. Seejuures jätab robot õpitu meelde.
Robot on ülesande täitmiseks võimeline koguma informatsiooni ka välistest allikatest, sealhulgas internetist ja teistelt robotitelt. Sel teel muutub ta järkjärgult targemaks.
neovo wrote:Maailma üle võtvate robotite all mõeldakse AI-d( tehisintelligentsi) mis omandab iseseisvalt teadmisi. Aga sellised op süsteemid nagu android vms. On programeeritud kindlateks tegudeks ja otstarveteks ja ei ole suutelised iseseisvalt arenema. Aga ei usu ka et tehisintelligents üle võtab midagi... Ahnus ja domineerivus on inimloomus mitte osa masinast.